Justin Dunham

's journal about making things

Understanding flour

Filed under: Cooking Journal — Tags: , , , — Justin Dunham on September 26, 2010

Will Ferrell trying to woo a baker. From the movie "Stranger than Fiction".

Totally radical starch molecules. (See Wikipedia articles for image source).

A few years ago, I heard Alton Brown make a comment that has stuck in my head ever since. “A starch high in amylopectin,” he said, “will not create a gel that is quite as thick as amylose, but it will tolerate temperatures well below freezing. So, for my frozen pie filling, I will go with amylopectin-packed tapioca flour.”

First of all, let me say that I am aware that this is not the type of comment that sticks in normal people’s heads.

But having said that, this was so surprising to me because I had no idea flour could do this for you. And yet here Alton Brown was, casually using an obscure flour for an obscure, but probably good, reason. I have no idea whether this substitution is actually effective. But it made me wonder, can I one day improve my recipes by thinking creatively about flour? As a first step, I’ve written this entry.

First of all, what is flour?

  • Generally, flour is any powder made out of grains, or sometimes seeds or roots, or indeed nuts (e.g. almond flour). You can also make flour from things like crickets, and yes, make cricket bread.
  • Etymologically, the word “flour” has the same root as “flower”. Both come from the French fleur, which refers to a flower. The word flour originated in the phrase fleur de farine, “the flower of the meal”, i.e. the finest part of the meal, since flour is a refined grain.
  • You may have encountered this idiom yourself if you’ve bought any fleur de sel, “the flower of the salt”, i.e. the best salt you can buy.

Flour appears to have two main components, starch and protein (gluten).

  • The starch consists largely of two long sugar molecules, amylose and amylopectin.
    • Amylopectin is a branched molecule. When you add water to it, it readily takes up the water molecules and forms a sticky gel.
    • Amylose, on the other hand, has linear chains which are harder to break and which therefore don’t gelatinize as easily.
    • This ratio helps to explain why different types of rice behave differently. Rice that is high in amylopectin content, such as short and medium grain rice, tends to stick – think sushi rice. Your typical supermarket rice, which is fluffy when cooked, has high amylose content.
  • The protein you will likely have encountered – gluten – also comprises two molecules, glutenin and gliadin.
    • Glutenin and gliadin both contain bonds of two sulfur molecules. Why does this matter? Because when these molecules are agitated (e.g. when you knead a dough) in the presence of water, the bonds within the glutenin molecules break and reform between molecules.
    • The result is a tough, elastic network that gives bread its form. The more you knead, or the more time you leave the dough to develop, the tougher it will be.
    • Many flours do not contain gluten. Instead, (a) they have some other protein that fulfills this function, or (b) you might need to actually add gluten or wheat flour.

There are lots of other things to talk about also, but those seem to be the main relevant components. So what are the differences between different types of flour?

  • Protein (gluten) content.
    • Bread flour has a protein content of around 13%. All-purpose flour has a protein content of about 11%, and cake flour has a protein content of 7% – 8%.
    • As a result, cakes tend to be fluffy and soft, bread is chewy and elastic, and most other things are somewhere in the middle.
  • Whole wheat vs. white flour.
    • Whole wheat flour contains the entire wheat grain; white flour contains only the part of the grain that the seed uses to grow.
    • Whole wheat flour has more nutrients, but is denser and therefore requires more leavening to rise.
    • Note that products that are advertised as “whole wheat” aren’t necessarily made entirely with whole wheat flour; only 51% whole wheat flour is required.
  • Different ratios of amylose to amylopectin.
    • Above, I said that amylopectin tends to gel more readily. In practice, this means that flours higher in amylopectin can be used at lower temperatures (though the gel may not be as strong).
    • This means that, as a crazy example, if you are making a pie with a frozen filling, you’ll want to use a high-amylopectin flour so that the crust can still come together even at a low temperature.
  • Lots of other things.
    • For more information and detail about different flour types, check out this article. And this article gives an awesome, and much more detailed, overview of the complex molecular interactions at play.

Dinner for seven

Filed under: Cooking Journal — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , — Justin Dunham on September 18, 2010

Roasted tomatoes stuffed with scallions and corn.

Risotto on the simmer.

In late August I had the wonderful opportunity to make dinner for seven! I invited several of my classmates over so we could all get to know each other and finish up a class project.

I made things I’ve made before: carrot soup, stuffed tomatoes, braised celery, braised short ribs and beet risotto. Old favorites, you might even call them. I picked these because they’re relatively easy to make – and because I’ve made them so many times before I’d be unlikely to screw them up!

Culinarily, one thing that was interesting is that we had a vegetarian joining us. Cooking for vegetarians is a brand-new experience for me. To make it work, I substituted vegetable stock for the chicken stock I usually use in making risotto, and for the beef stock I usually use when braising celery.

Vegetable stock definitely does not work quite as well for risotto. You lose a certain savoriness. I may try mushroom stock next time, or half mushroom, half vegetable, to get that back. Vegetable stock also attenuates the color a bit – the risotto at the bottom of the pan started to turn orange!

However, I would argue that braised celery tastes even better with vegetable stock. If you ignore the directions to cover the pan (which I did), the stock boils off a bit, leaving you with a nice, syrupy, vaguely-tomato sauce.

Logistically, this was the only the second time I’ve cooked for more than 3 people, and I also had barely any time on the day of to completely the dishes. To resolve this, I tried to pick stuff that is either very quick to make (braised celery and to a certain extent beet risotto) or that can be made overnight (short ribs and carrot soup). Braised dishes actually tend to taste better the day after they are cooked, which was the case this time also. Something about the dispersion of the various sapid molecules, maybe?

I would guess that I spent an entire workday or so actually making the dishes, which is fairly typical when I make a complex dish – the additional servings add more time, but not twice as much to make twice as many servings, for example. Eventually, I will need to learn to reduce cooking times. I wonder how many times I have to make a dish before this happens?

Finally, I also struggled with how many servings to make. I didn’t want anyone to go hungry. On the other hand, we have been sort of overwhelmed by the amount of leftovers we’ve had lately, and I wanted to avoid that too. I actually ended up simply doubling what I normally make for me and my fiancee (which usually results in several days of leftovers). This seemed to work pretty well.

One final note: To make risotto, you essentially just spoon hot broth into hot risotto rice, wait until the broth is absorbed, and repeat. I have been skipping heating the broth before pouring it in, because it saves a little time and you end up with one fewer pot to clean. But I think this may be a big mistake. The risotto took almost an hour to make (instead of 30 minutes), and I am guessing this may be because the cool broth “shocks” the hot rice, leading to a protracted period of re-warming before anything else can be absorbed.

Radish risotto, chicken paillard, cardamom carrots

Filed under: Cooking Journal — Tags: , , , , , , , , — Justin Dunham on September 11, 2010

The dish. You can see the radish risotto (the julienned radishes are just visible) in the back. For some reason, I put the chicken beneath the avocado slices, so you can't see it as well. Next time, I will serve about half as much avocado, or maybe turn it into some kind of salsa.

For a single-course dinner a couple weeks ago, I made the following: chicken paillards, carrots roasted with cardamom, and radish risotto. I served all of this with an avocado and some leftover corn salsa.

I had to improvise a little bit. The grocery-store situation in Philadelphia is a little touch-and-go, so I couldn’t get the parsnips – and indeed potatoes – called for in the recipe I linked above! So I decided to just go with the carrots. Similarly, I had some chicken thighs,  but I didn’t feel like roasting them. So I cut them off the bone, flattened them, and seared them quickly (about 3 minutes, maybe a little more, on each side).

As far as the individual components, everything came out really well. The paillards in particular stayed juicy and had a particularly intense chicken flavor. I love radishes, and the risotto recipe allows them to retain a little kick, and a lot of crunchiness. The colors are also beautiful. My only complaint is that the recipe calls for too much cheese, I think.

Evaluating the dinner as a whole, there were many things I liked about it. The flavors were uniformly delicious. They married pretty well together, even though the components aren’t drawn from the same cuisines. I care a lot about color when I cook, and the food was almost a full rainbow – red (radishes), orange (carrots), yellow and green (avocadoes), brown and off-white (chicken and rice).

However, I ran into some presentation issues. As you can see in the picture above, I put the avocadoes on top of the chicken. This actually looked nicer than putting the avocado under the chicken, which I also tried. It certainly isn’t unappetizing, it’s just a little confusing. I think next time I will either serve a bit less avocado, or maybe make it into some kind of salsa as a substitute for the corn salsa. The problem is that (a) the chicken really needs some kind of sauce, but (b) the avocado goes so well with all the other savory components that it seems a shame to leave it out.

Borscht, scallops and succotash, and gingerbread trifle

Filed under: Cooking Journal — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — Justin Dunham on September 6, 2010

Building the trifle. I have put down the first layer of gingerbread cubes in the bowl on the right, which will be covered with the lemon curd mixture and blackberry sauce on the left, then more gingerbread...

The mostly complete trifle.

Borscht. Check out that color!

Succotash and scallops.

Very soon after having moved to Philadelphia, I made the following meal: borscht, scallops with succotash, and gingerbread trifle.

This was my first meal in a new kitchen, so I thought I’d go with something simple. Borscht is a delicious beet soup with the typical awesome magenta beet color, and it’s pretty easy to make. The only time-consuming thing is boiling the beets, which takes quite a while.

(On an unrelated sidenote, according to the Wikipedia article there are apparently other types of borscht that involve tomatoes or sorrel. Amazingly, sour cream, which is a typical borscht ingredient, reacts with the molecules in sorrel that cause a sour taste, neutralizing them.)

Succotash is a mixture of vegetables such as corn, lima beans, and zucchini; scallops are sauteed for a few minutes and served on top. The first time I made this I used jumbo scallops, which are quite large but which are also extremely expensive. This time, I just used small ones.

Dessert was the most complicated piece, as it often is, because it is the most important. (I am only half-joking).

In general, a trifle is “a dessert dish made from… custard, fruit, sponge cake, fruit juice or gelatin, and whipped cream”, arranged in layers (Wikipedia). In this case, the trifle is made from lemon curd, gingerbread baked from scratch, and a blackberry sauce.

The flavors go really well together. You get the sweetness of the gingerbread first, which is balanced by the lemon curd, and finally the tart blackberry sauce hits you. As time goes on, the flavors and textures come together even more. This is very similar to banana pudding, which I would argue is also a kind of trifle.

Can explosives tenderize a steak?

Filed under: Cooking Journal — Tags: , — Justin Dunham on September 2, 2010

Explosions. (These are unrelated to steak.) Picture taken by Wikipedia user pdphoto; you can click the photo for the source page.

Since we don’t have cable – or antenna reception – I’ve been going through the TV offerings on Netflix.

Netflix has a lot of old MythBusters episodes, and on one, they test a myth that steak can be tenderized by (a) shooting it out of a cannon, or (b) by subjecting it to shockwaves from high explosives. I admit that I wasn’t originally sure who would come up with a story like this, or under what circumstances this would have happened in real life. (There is also a third myth that a steak can be tenderized by putting it in a dryer with a bunch of ball bearings; this one isn’t as interesting to me).

The result is that you can indeed tenderize a steak by blowing it up or shooting it out of a cannon. I guess this would be because shockwaves tend to cause tissue – including the connective tissue that makes meat tough – to disintegrate, which is one reason why explosives are so dangerous.

And in fact, not only can you do this, but there’s a name for the process: hydrodynamic pressure processing. Here’s a link to an abstract for a patent on this process. Here’s a link to a paper describing the process, from NASA, oddly, and here’s another one with the full text available online. Apparently to do it right, you put the meat on a steel plate at the bottom of a plastic water vessel. Then you blow it up with something that will create a significant shockwave, without shredding the meat (C4 is too strong). No word on whether the plastic bucket survives.

Apparently this is a really good way to tenderize meat while preserving its overall texture, flavor, and juiciness. In addition, the explosion is particularly harmful to the bacteria leading to meat spoilage, leading to longer shelf life.

One of the articles in a news database I have access to suggests that a food processing company, Tenderwave, was formed based on the idea. (They also apparently used technology in other wacky ways, including using electricity to juice oranges, somehow). But I wasn’t able to find evidence that the company existed past 1999 or so. Here’s a description of Tenderwave’s tenderizing process:

A 7,000-pound steel tank is filled with water and lined with dynamite charges. The meat, packaged to protect it from water and contaminants, is placed in the water, and an eight-foot-tall, 5,000-pound steel dome is secured over it. When the dynamite goes off, about two feet from the meat, the shock waves travel through the water and tear certain muscle proteins in the meat… Developers say the Hydrodyne process could increase the tenderness of budget-grade meat by 50%-72%.

Anecdotally, my fiance also tells me that it is possible to toast a bagel by ironing it. Look for an entry on that soon.

Creative Commons License
.